|
|
By Brian Kernighan, Christopher Van Wyk. Compares how fast C, Awk, Perl, Tcl, Java, Visual Basic, Limbo, Scheme, run a range of representative tasks. Text, tables, graphs, code samples. http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/bwk/interps/pap.html |
|
[more pages from this URL]
|
|
|
Text treats general aspects of language choices, then compares hatred of Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, Java, C, C++, JavaScript, XSLT, SQL. With many forum comments. [ONLamp.com] http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/05/12/languagephilosophy.html |
|
[more pages from this URL]
|
|
|
Yes-No table with definitions compares D, C, C++, C#, Java, on: GC, functions, arrays, OOP, performance, reliability, compatibility, conditional compiling. [Digital Mars] http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/comparison.html |
|
[more pages from this URL]
|
|
|
Multipage study compares: 4GL/5GL, 3GL (Ada 95, C, C++, COBOL, FORTRAN, Java, Smalltalk), 2GL (Assembly). Divides language (definition) from traits of products that implement and support it. Several sections, tables, appendixes. http://archive.adaic.com/docs/reports/lawlis/content.htm |
|
[more pages from this URL]
|
|